Thromb Haemost 2010; 104(02): 327-334
DOI: 10.1160/TH10-01-0024
Endothelium and Vascular Development
Schattauer GmbH

Circulating progenitor cells in patients with atrial fibrillation and their relation with serum markers of inflammation and angiogenesis

Timothy Watson*
1   Haemostasis Thrombosis and Vascular Biology Unit, University of Birmingham Centre for Cardiovascular Sciences, City Hospital, Birmingham, UK
,
Eduard Shantsila*
1   Haemostasis Thrombosis and Vascular Biology Unit, University of Birmingham Centre for Cardiovascular Sciences, City Hospital, Birmingham, UK
,
Andrew Blann
1   Haemostasis Thrombosis and Vascular Biology Unit, University of Birmingham Centre for Cardiovascular Sciences, City Hospital, Birmingham, UK
,
Gregory Y. H. Lip
1   Haemostasis Thrombosis and Vascular Biology Unit, University of Birmingham Centre for Cardiovascular Sciences, City Hospital, Birmingham, UK
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received: 08 January 2010

Accepted after major revision: 28 March 2010

Publication Date:
24 November 2017 (online)

Preview

Summary

The pathophysiological inter-relationships and underlying ‘drivers’ of a prothrombotic state in atrial fibrillation (AF) are complex but may include endothelial abnormalities. Circulating progenitor cells (CPCs) have been recently described as a cell population that may promote repair of endothelial damage. We hypothesised abnormalities in this cell population, alongside abnormal markers of endothelial damage/dysfunction (von Willebrand factor, soluble E-selectin), apoptosis (soluble Fas, soluble Fas ligand), angiogenesis (vascular endothelial growth factor) and inflammation (interleukin-6) in 135 consecutive AF patients (14 with lone AF), who were compared to 33 ‘disease controls’ and 13 healthy controls. We also explored whether restoration of sinus rhythm would alter these indices. No significant differences in research indices were observed between AF and disease controls, apart from soluble Fas levels (p<0.001). Median CPC levels in lone AF were higher compared to ‘non-lone AF’ (that is, AF patients with co-morbidities) [p<0.001], apparently because of difference in age and presence of co-morbidities. There was an increase in CPC counts (p=0.007), but in not other markers following DC cardioversion. CPCs increased significantly in the 17 patients who were successfully cardioverted into sinus rhythm (p=0.003). In a stepwise multiple regression analysis, age (p=0.014), hyperlipidaemia (p=0.001) and use of statins (but not AF) was predictive of CPC counts (p=0.014). In conclusion, AF is unlikely to be independently associated with abnormalities in CPCs. Successful cardioversion is associated with a modest but significant increase in CPCs.

* Drs. Watson and Shantsila contributed equally to this work and are joint 1st authors.